Eckenfels. Bernd wrote:
> Thinks we need to consider:
>
>Bla:Proc1 and Fasel:Proc2 both define a PartnerLink name="initial" -
>are outstanding receives allowed?
>
>Bla.Proc1 defines two PartnerLink name="initial" in <scope><partnerLink
>name="initial" /><scope><partnerLink name="initial"
>/>...</sceope></scope> - are two conflicting receives allowed?
>
>
The other possibility is that these two receives (in both examples) are
not conflicting since the partner links are distinct, and therefore can
be enabled simultaneously.
My reading of the spec is that if you declare two partner links, they
are distinct. As are two instances resulting from two process instances
or scope instances. The name does not disambiguate globally, nor is it
the source of distinction.
Assaf
>Greetings
>Bernd
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>
>
