My understanding/recollection of the
decision of the TC is that any issue that doesn't have a proposal put forward
by April 1 will be considered for closure by the TC (with the revisit flag
set) and will remain open only if the TC votes to keep it open (can't recall
whether the vote is simple majority or 2/3 majority but will check before
next meeting).
Hopefully we will avoid doing anything
too silly.
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
Danny van der Rijn <>
03/22/2005 02:13 PM
To
Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
wsbpeltc <>
Subject
[wsbpel] Process question
I'm going through the list of issues as April 1 approaches.
I notice that I still have 120 open, which is dependent on Issue 96. By
our rules, do I need to have a proposal out for 120 by April 1? What
the proposal actually is is heavily dependent on 96, but I can put out
a
placeholder proposal if the process requires it.
Danny
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
