Re: [wsbpel] Issue 199: Message Variable Naming Scheme

From
Alex Yiu <>
Date
2005-03-16T16:02:22+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 199: Message Variable Naming Scheme
Hi Yuzo and others, 

Just want to supplement info that there is a well-defined character
sets that we can use within a NCNAME. 

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#NT-NCName

It looks like "." may be a good choice. 

Regards,

Alex Yiu

  
 
  

  

  
  Issue
199: Message Variable Naming Scheme
  
Status: received

  Date added: 16 Mar 2005

  Categories: Data
handling

  Date submitted: 16 March 2005

  Submitter: Yuzo
Fujishima

  Champion: Yuzo Fujishima <>

  Document: Issue 103 resolution

  Description: Since Issue 103 has been resolved without
defining concrete naming scheme for message variables, we need a new
issue to discuss it. 

  
The BPEL issues list lists three
candiates: 

  
A. $variable.part B. $variable_part C.
$variable-part 

  
Submitter's proposal: I think
candidate C is not viable because "-" will be interpreted as the minus
operator. 

  
Choose candiate A and make it illegal
to have "." in variable names.

  Changes: 16 Mar 2005 - new issue