Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 81 - Did we pass it?
I agree we passed it - my notes say it is intended to be a clarification with no semantic change. Here is the relevent extract from the minutes for Wed. PM when it was discussed. 1 Issue 81 Yaron had a proposal. (msg00127) Alex had sent minor wording amendments in msg00018. No change of significance. No discussions. Yaron proposed, Alex seconded. Danny objected to vote. Those in favour of adopting Yaron’s proposal as amended by Alex’s email: 13 yes. No vote: 1. Regards, Diane IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709 Alex Yiu <> 03/11/2005 11:45 PM To cc wsbpeltc <>, Alex Yiu <> Subject Re: [wsbpel] Issue 81 - Did we pass it? I also we passed it. It was Yaron's proposal + Alex's amendent. (If my memory is correct, I think there was even no opposition.) http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200502/msg00127.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200503/msg00033.html Hopefully, the meeting will record it. Regards, Alex Yiu Yaron Y. Goland wrote: > I was reviewing Diane's slides from the meeting and I didn't see issue > 81 marked as passed. I thought we had passed > <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200502/msg00127.html>? > > Yaron > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:
Next in thread →
Next in month →