Danny van der Rijn wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
> Dieter's suggestion is to terminate the process immediately. I don't
> see this as the best possible way. I can imagine saying that such
> behavior is unspecified, but I'm not comfortable with that. Which
> leaves me preferring exactly what's there now. We may have to agree
> to disagree on this, though, since I doubt my argument is anything new
> to you.
I don't have a problem with Dieter's proposal to make it a normative
behavior for the process engine to decide to terminate the process in
those states, as long as it doesn't preclude other (non-normative)
behaviors from affecting this decision.
Assaf
