Hello Prasad:
> Yes there have been guesses and assumptions on why this
> constraint had been placed. The issue is not arguing
> against the constraint being in the spec (that was 189).
> All it is asking for is that some clarifying text to be
> added to justify the purpose of the constraint, instead
> of leaving it up for guesses or assumptions.
I feel the WS-BPEL specification would be strengthened
and many time wasting debates avoided, if the authors
of key passages stated their intent and if a well understood
design philosophy existed.
> Agree that this could be one of the reasons (again a
> guess / assumption), though IMO BPEL is not necessarily
> always directly manipulation by a programmer. It could be
> generated from a tool (a typical case IMO).
I find that the high level tool is used way too often as
a panacea for defficencies in WS-BPEL :-(
Cheers,
Andrew
