Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 166 - Does atomicity in assign imply variablelocking?

From: Danny van der Rijn <>
Date: 2004-09-30T04:34:56+00:00
ID
Thread: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 166 - Does atomicity in assign imply variablelocking?

Hello Danny:

DJ> assignment is already atomic.&nbsp; yaron's proposal
DJ>adds implicit locks to give programmers a concurrency
DJ>crutch.

YY>The easy solution would appear to be to
YY>declare that assigns always execute in an implicit
YY>serialzable scope but this 'easy' solution causes 
YY>some conceptual problems in the case that the scope 
YY>the assign is a member of is itself already serializable.
YY>This edge case matters because of:

View original preserved HTML → View on OASIS Connected Community →

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →