A big +1 from me.
Regards,
Alex Yiu
Yaron Y. Goland wrote:
> Any time a proposal gets too big it can be difficult to make progress
> because too many issues get mixed up together. As such I propose that
> we break issue 103 into separate proposals, much as we did with issue 10.
>
> The first proposal I think should go out for a vote would be a
> modified version of the current 103 proposal that removes the WSDL
> binding to XPATH variables, keeps the getVariableData function and
> doesn't change the current from-specs and to-specs.
>
> This proposal would just include the binding of non-WSDL BPEL
> variables to XPATH variables along with defining the XPATH environment
> in which various BPEL expressions execute.
>
> Then when we settle exactly how we would like to model WSDL variables
> we can decide the future of getVariableData(), how WSDL variables will
> appear in XPATH (including any special forms for doc/lit), if we would
> like to allow properties to be bound to variables, what from-spec and
> to-specs we want to use, etc.
>
> I believe that by breaking this problem up into discrete issues we can
> make more rapid progress.
>
> What does the group think?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yaron
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
> of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
