Re: [Fwd: Re: [wsbpel] abstract process strawman]

From
Danny van der Rijn <>
Date
2004-09-24T19:19:02+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [Fwd: Re: [wsbpel] abstract process strawman]
So how do they refer to things like order?  Using pseudo qnames for the
schemas?

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:25 AM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [wsbpel] abstract process strawman]

i was hoping that i misunderstood the intent.  i bothered to be so 
detailed so someone could point out the error in my misunderstanding.

as far as a list of features, no i don't have one.  they are just 
omitting what they please and providing what they find to be usefully 
portable.  but a concrete example of that that i do know is that they 
are leaving out specifics of the WSDLs.  "you receive an order here, and

you send a confirmation response."  that's all that you need to know at 
that point.  not what a line item looks like.  not even what an order 
looks like.

Satish Thatte wrote: