Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler

From
Ron Ten-Hove <>
Date
2003-12-31T16:05:24+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
I am thinking of cases where a BPEL extension translates into modified/enhanced behavior of the deployed process. As a potential user of that process, I would like to know in advance whether that extension is supported before I actually interact with the process.

Ugo
Next in thread → Next in month →