+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sid Askary [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:46 PM
> To:
> Subject: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit
> compensation Handler
>
>
> Satish,
> As I said, I think your solution (the reverse temporal order)
> is a good one. I think I have a simple compromise: that we
> add a sentence to the effect that
>
> " Note: Sole reliance on implicit compensation handlers as a
> programming construct or as a means of defining default
> system behavior is not recommended."
>
> This may address both the "programmatic" (Yaron's) and
> default behavior (my own) assumptions.
>
> Not sure about Peter's concern.
>
> - Sid.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le
> ave_workgroup.php.
>
>
