Peter,
What is an example of erroneous WSDL 1.1 features?
Satish
-----Original Message-----
From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:49 PM
To:
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
Following the discussion on issue 72 on the list and on the 15 October
call, the following resolution is proposed, hoping for a vote at the
next conference call:
A The BPEL language definition shall not interpret
underspecified/erroneous
WSDL 1.1 features in a way that is contradictory with BP 1.0
interpretation
B Use-case artifacts shall be either BP 1.0 compliant or have a
necessary and
explained reason to be otherwise
C Use-cases shall be capable of implementation with exclusively BP 1.0
services or have a necessary and explained reason to be otherwise
D Conformant bpel engines shall be able to offer and use BP 1.0
services,
but are free to implement other bindings and encodings even with
soap/http
E No restriction is made on deployed bpel processes
---
These correspond to the A.1 as modified by Ugo, B3, C2, D2 and E2 of the
"Some proposals" message
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200310/msg00105.html
If you think these aren't right, please propose amendments prior to the
meeting so everyone gets a chance to see what's on offer.
Peter
------------------------------------------
Peter Furniss
Chief Scientist, Choreology Ltd
Cohesions 1.0 (TM)
Business transaction management software for application coordination
web: http://www.choreology.com
email:
phone: +44 870 739 0066 <-- new, from 4 August 2003
mobile: +44 7951 536168
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr
oup.php.
