TC ArchivesMailing list preservation

Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other?

wsbpel · August 2003 · 21 messages · back to month

# Subject From Date
00158 Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Yaron Goland 2003-08-18 22:57
00169 RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-19 21:19
00170 RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Yaron Goland 2003-08-19 22:01
00174 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Maciej Szefler 2003-08-20 14:34
00176 RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-20 15:00
00178 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-20 15:12
00181 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Tony Andrews 2003-08-20 15:47
00186 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Yaron Goland 2003-08-20 18:18
00189 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Edwin Khodabakchian 2003-08-20 19:43
00190 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Yaron Goland 2003-08-20 19:51
00191 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Edwin Khodabakchian 2003-08-20 20:12
00192 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Yaron Goland 2003-08-20 20:28
00193 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Ugo Corda 2003-08-20 20:33
00198 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Eckenfels. Bernd 2003-08-21 13:26
00199 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-23 00:02
00205 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Yaron Goland 2003-08-26 17:35
00209 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-26 21:18
00225 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-27 17:07
00229 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Sazi Temel 2003-08-28 04:25
00230 RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? Satish Thatte 2003-08-28 06:17
00241 Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 52 - Should BPEL provide a standard way to specify when flows are sending messages to each other? David RR Webber - XML ebusiness 2003-08-30 01:25