RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested

From
Yaron Goland <>
Date
2003-08-20T18:25:03+00:00
ID
006e01c3674b$1f7930b0$
Thread
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 Your opinion requested
Both 
proposals cause me to worry. I know I'm no where near enough of an expert in the 
XML infomodel and XPATH's abstract model to be sure of the total consequences of 
our actions. But given that XQUERY is coming and is likely to be a huge hit I 
would hate to see us choose an option that cuts us off from the future, which 
the XPATH proposal appears to do. Basically I'm +1ing Tony Andrew's 
comment.

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny van der Rijn 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:55 
  AM
To: 
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 
  - 11 Your opinion requested

  

  
At the conference call this morning, I presented 
  issue 11 as it has progressed so far.  The current state is that there 
  are 2 proposals on the table, both of which are equivalent in terms of what 
  they accomplish, but we don't need both of them.  The desire is that we 
  get some feedback from the TC as to which avenue to pursue, so that we can 
  flush out one of them, and present it to the TC for a vote.  Links to the 
  issues are below.  If you have any opinon at all, please respond to this 
  mail with AT LEAST +A/-A +B/-B so we can gauge reactions to the 
  proposals.  If you want to share reasons for your opinion, that is 
  welcome, too.  Note that you should take these proposals as 
  partially-baked.  We plan to refine the "winning" proposal into one that 
  is spec-worthy.

  
 

  
On the call and in email since the summaries were 
  posted, there has been some discussion.  I have linked the email point 
  here, and I hope that those who expressed support for either option (I believe 
  it was just Yaron, but I could be wrong) will repeat them in email for 
  posterity.  Unfortunately, Chris Keller was not on the call at the time 
  of discussion, and I was unable to present his proposal with the clarity that 
  he would have, so the discussion may have been skewed in favor of my 
  proposal.  If that occurred, it was certainly not my intention to bias 
  the discussion.

  
 

  
The hope is that we will get a sense of direction by the next conference 
  call, and failing that, at the September face to face.  Putting the issue 
  to a Kavi ballot for a sense of direction was also raised (by Monica Martin?), 
  since that would force those who cared to state their opinion.

  
 

  
Issue 
  presentation and Proposal A: Author Danny van der Rijn: Add BPEL 
  elements

  
Tony 
  Andrew's "+A" mail

  
 

  

  
Proposal 
  B: Author Chris Keller: Add XPath Functions