Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to

From
Danny van der Rijn <>
Date
2003-08-14T19:27:16+00:00
ID
00bb01c3629c$66783500$7b7ba8c0@HEN3RY
Thread
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to
ah, i see.  is the only reason for this that otherwise it would open up
issue 49?  i can see lots of uses for this, especially with the event
handlers (how do you guard against multiple concurrent status requests?),
but also business uses.

thanks
danny

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dieter Roller" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:50 AM
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 49 - Disambiguating <receive>s to <reply> to


> Danny,
>
> this would result in a conflictingRequest exception unless the correlation
> sets differ ...
>
> Cheers,
>
> dieter
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>
>