Satish Thatte wrote:
>I believe a <sequence> activity can be replaced with a <flow
>suppressJoinFailure="false"> activity with a few more caveats, to
>produce equivalent control sequencing behavior. Why do you ask?
>
>Satish
>
>
The whole discussion started from the comment made by Bernd "especially
the second case shows, that there is no need for the sequence activity
from a control flow point of few. I guess it would be good to add some
comments on this in the spec."
So if we nail down the difference we may want to include such an
explanation in the text.
arkin
