← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
WAS Protect update
>> I'll send stuff I produce to the mailing list. My plan is to: >> >> 1. Produce another version of the "spec" >> 2. Use it for the reference implementation >> 3. Update the spec if necessary >> 4. Document everything >> >> As far as mod_security/Apache is concerned, Protect will probably >> be implemented as a wrapper around the existing functionality. I've started to work on WAS Protect. I have attached my best attempt at the protection language. Before I go and make this into a formal specification I would like to hear your opinions. Now is the time to make changes! :) To summarize the changes: my previous effort was ambitious, maybe too ambitious. For most of my language constructs I was unable to find use cases so I decided to simplify. I did that and I like the result. The examples are at the bottom of the file, I think they demonstrate how easy it can be to protect an application. At the same time, I think the format allows for extensions, should we decide to make them in the future. There is no meta-data here. Each protection recipe relates to a WAS vulnerability. The role of a recipe is to inspect the variables at one of four (practically three) processing stages, and invoke an error/warning/notice where appropriate. -- ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org) [ Open source IDS for Web applications ]
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →