yes, but i thought it went better under the section "Consensus : Response to User Requirements".
On 21/02/2014, at 11:57 PM, Oriol Bausà Peris wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I do not know whether you could also mention the work done within the CEN BII Workshop binding European legal requirements to the main UBL Procurement documents in –- Alignment : Relationship to Existing Standards or another section.
>
> Oriol Bausà
>
> El 21/02/2014, a les 07:37, Tim McGrath <> va escriure:
>
>> OASIS have drafted a short explanatory note for JTC 1 about the PAS submission of UBL 2.1 and asked us for any comments. I have uploaded a copy of this draft (with my comments) to:
>>
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/download.php/52284/UBL%20PAS%20Explanatory%20Note%20INTERNAL%20DRAFT%20%20v3%20%202014.docx
>>
>> Please read this and send any comments (to this UBL list) before Feb 26th so we can finalize this on the call(s) that day.
>>
>>
>> Note: we are not 'approving' this - it is just an opportunity to provide feedback for OASIS.
>>
>>
>> -----------------
>> Regards
>> Tim McGrath
>>
>> Fremantle, Western Australia
>> http://www.documentengineeringservices.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>
>
-----------------
Regards
Tim McGrath
Fremantle, Western Australia
http://www.documentengineeringservices.com
