At 2010-01-10 22:50 +0100, JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino wrote:
>I am not sure the common schema fragments are final as the FIRTG
>issues has never been completely solved by PSC.
>
>I'll be able to check the remaining issues on tuesday 12.
In my post I do not claim all of the common fragments as being final:
At 2010-01-09 17:34 -0500, I wrote:
>it looks like this might be the final strategy document and the
>normative artefacts to use for the common schema fragments, not
>including the aggregate and basic component fragments being created
>by the PSC and TSC committees.
I do believe these are candidate final fragments for everything
*other* than the aggregate and basic component fragments that you are
concerned about. Unless you think the unresolved FIRTG issues impact
fragments other than the aggregate and basic component fragments.
I hope that committee members can give any feedback they can on the
new approach, based on an untouched UN/CEFACT schema in the import
tree that gives us all of the supplementary components for core
component types, not just the subset deemed by UN/CEFACT in their
choice of data types that are tied to certain code lists delivered in UBL 2.0.
I hope this clarifies my post for you, Roberto, and for any other
archive readers.
. . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
UBL and Code List training: Copenhagen, Denmark 2010-02-08/10
XSLT/XQuery/XPath training after http://XMLPrague.cz 2010-03-15/19
XSLT/XQuery/XPath training: San Carlos, California 2010-04-26/30
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18
Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18
G. Ken Holman mailto:
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
