[:]
| The ID should be an unique identifier and the name samples should
| be moved to Name.
|
| Here these common names (mentioned on ID) do not identify strictly
| a different document type.
Then I think that they should be Alternative Business Terms for
the entire document.
Here's the change I'm making unless someone tells me different:
6.20 In UBL-ForwardingInstructions-2.0.ods:
6.20b Text "Freight Forwarding Instruction, Shippers Letter
of Instruction" moved from Alternative Business Terms
for ID (cell N6) to Alternative Business Terms for the
document itself (cell N2), joining "Forwarding
Instruction"; "Shipping Instruction" added to
Alternative Business Terms in the same cell
The result is that ForwardingInstructions now has the Alternative
Business Terms Forwarding Instruction, Freight Forwarding
Instruction, Shippers Letter of Instruction, and Shipping
Instruction.
Jon
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:56:14 +0100
From: JAVEST <>
Cc:
Hello,
here we have again names identifying different context but not a
different document type, in fact both are defining a forwarding
instruction to an international forwarder. A distiction like those I
copied below is today an error because international forwarders are
organizing the whole shipment even door-2-door and using different
carriers type (vessels, airplane, train) and they act as airfreight
forwarders, shipping forwarders... but businesses are often the same.
Forwarding Instructions
A document initially introduced for container cargo delivery, _but now
in widespread use_. It is normally a multi-page form, which allows
copies to be issued to Container Depot Staff, Shipping Company Staff and
the haulier. The document is used to advise the shipping company of the
shipper's requirements for completing the B/L, and also acts as an
Interim Receipt.
and
Shipper's Letter of Instruction (SLI)
This is a document provided by the exporter to the airfreight forwarder
as an instruction for the completion of the Air Waybill. The SLI
normally accompanies the goods to the forwarder's premises and should
show the ECN if required. Failure to do so may result in the consignment
missing the booked flight.
My note:
An international forwarding service can be asked to organize shipment
and start required transport contracts with carriers, but always from a
Shipper.
Who act as Shipper is not important.
The ID should be an unique identifier and the name samples should be
moved to Name.
Here these common names (mentioned on ID) do not identify strictly a
different document type.
ha scritto:
> At item 6.20 in the Update Package work list, we have:
>
> 6.20 ForwardingInstructions / ID (BBIE): In definition, remove
> second sentence; in Business Terms, add "shipping
> instruction".
>
> The first part is easy enough, but where does the new Business
> Term go? Logically it would seem to belong in cell N6 along with
> "Freight Forwarding Instruction, Shippers Letter of Instruction",
> but why are these Alternative Business Terms for ID? Shouldn't
> they be terms for the document itself (cell N2)?
>
> Jon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
--Boundary_(ID_UzuaE7O0/+ZI9GZZZoFntg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hello,<br>
here we have again names identifying different context but not a
different document type, in fact both are defining a forwarding
instruction to an international forwarder. A distiction like those I
copied below is today an error because international forwarders are
organizing the whole shipment even door-2-door and using different
carriers type (vessels, airplane, train) and they act as airfreight
forwarders, shipping forwarders... but businesses are often the same.<br>
<br>
<font class="homelink"> Forwarding Instructions<br>
A document initially introduced for container cargo delivery, <u>but
now in widespread use</u>. It is normally a multi-page form, which
allows copies to be issued to Container Depot Staff, Shipping Company
Staff and the haulier. The document is used to advise the shipping
company of the shipper's requirements for completing the B/L, and also
acts as an Interim Receipt.</font><br>
<br>
and <br>
<br>
<font class="homelink">Shipper's Letter of Instruction (SLI)<br>
This is a document provided by the exporter to the airfreight forwarder
as an instruction for the completion of the Air Waybill. The SLI
normally accompanies the goods to the forwarder's premises and should
show the ECN if required. Failure to do so may result in the
consignment missing the booked flight.</font><br>
<br>
My note:<br>
An international forwarding service can be asked to organize shipment
and start required transport contracts with carriers, but always from a
Shipper.<br>
Who act as Shipper is not important.<br>
<br>
The ID should be an unique identifier and the name samples should be
moved to Name.<br>
Here these common names (mentioned on ID) do not identify strictly a
different document type.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:"></a> ha scritto:
<blockquote
cite=""">mid:"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">At item 6.20 in the Update Package work list, we have:
6.20 ForwardingInstructions / ID (BBIE): In definition, remove
second sentence; in Business Terms, add "shipping
instruction".
The first part is easy enough, but where does the new Business
Term go? Logically it would seem to belong in cell N6 along with
"Freight Forwarding Instruction, Shippers Letter of Instruction",
but why are these Alternative Business Terms for ID? Shouldn't
they be terms for the document itself (cell N2)?
Jon
