Re: [ubl] Definitions of the Name element

From
JAVEST <>
Date
2008-02-05T20:50:43+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl] Definitions of the Name element
My opinion...

The reason a Freight Invoice document exists is because there are
effectively additional business entities not found on a Commercial
Invoice (e.g. Shipment)

The Self Invoice is not so different from a Commercial Invoice but it
is a way to identify this particular situation in a unambiguos way (as
it is a VAT aspect)

Generally there is not the reason to create another document if
business entities are the same, but just data changes.

Roberto

Oriol Bausà ha scritto:
Talking about invoice and type codes, I think there is
another issue. 
  

  

  
There is an InvoiceTypeCode BBIE in the Invoice document, but
there are also some different invoice type documents (aka Self Invoice
or Freight Invoice) so it is difficult to decide whether you should use
the InvoiceTypeCode or you should better define a new invoice document
type (for instance Rectification Invoice, Proforma Invoice, and so on). 

  

  

  

  

  

  
El 04/02/2008, a las 22:35, 
escribió:

  
  
    
Could I just 'chip in' on this. If it is as
it seems that the

    
Name is to be used for the type of document
when it comes to

    
the Waybill, then I would agree with Jon
that Name should be

    
on every document for this purpose since
even invoice needs

    
to state an invoice type and invoice type
code is only useful

    
when there is an agreed set of codes to use
to cover all

    
possibilities. For anything not coded there
would be value in

    
having a Text-based BBIE, in my opinion.