Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: SV: [ubl] Groups - UBL 2.0 Working draft 3 spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 WD3.zip) uploaded - comments

From
Tambi Kamarudin
Date
2006-06-14T02:14:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: SV: [ubl] Groups - UBL 2.0 Working draft 3 spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 WD3.zip) uploaded - comments
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: SV: [ubl] Groups - UBL 2.0 Working draft 3 spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 WD3.zip) uploaded - comments




From: "Kama, Kamarudin Bin Tambi" <>
To: "Tim McGrath" <>,"Peter Borresen" <>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:14:24 +0800














Yeah, agreed with Tim. The below rule on
CCTS DEN might be helpful.



•       
CCTS DEN

–        
Be
unique

–        
Be
concise and not contain consecutive redundancy words

–        
Nouns
should be expressed in the singular unless the concept is plural

–        
Do not
use non-alphabetical characters unless required by language rules

–        
Contains
only verbs, nouns and adjectives (no word like and, of ,the)

–        
Acronym
should not be included unless they are in the TBG17 list of approved acronyms
(in UBL case, those found in Appendix D of UBL NDR 2.0 draft)

–        
Have
multi-word terms separated by a single space

–        
Have the
three name parts of the DEN separated from each other by a period and a single
space

–        
Have
Qualifier Terms separated by an underscore and a single space



Rgds











From: Tim McGrath [mailto:]

Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006
9:20 AM

To: Peter Borresen

Cc: 

Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Groups -
UBL 2.0 Working draft 3 spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 WD3.zip) uploaded - comments





i am happy with most this. but see my note on 'Add 2'
and 'Add 4'


Peter Borresen wrote:




Add 1
Next in thread → Next in month →