RE: [ubl] More NDR Questions

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl] More NDR Questions




From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <>
To: 
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:07:03 -0400









 
> In 
the NDR there is no documentation item that reports the ObjectClassQualifier of 
an ASBIE. Apparently an error.
 
Although I agree that this would be useful information 
(and have no objection to adding it), is this information requested/required 
within the CCTS?
 
> Due the use of the 
UDT from ATG2 1.0 there is an inconsistency between the rule for 
abbreviation and that UDT schema. According to the rule the type has to be named 
"IDType", the schema says 
"IdentifierType".
Yes indeed. This is because ATG2 does not have the 
'restrictive' acronym rules we have. We need to capture that in the section 
where we explain our adoption of their UDT.
 
 
> 
 The is no rule for removing redundancies in names for BBIEs. So you 
will find a lot of things like "IDIDType" and so on. 
 
How about adding "Redundant words 
in the representation term, property 
term or its qualifiers MUST be removed."
 


  
  
  From: Sylvia Webb [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, 07 June 2006 0916
To: 
  
Subject: [ubl] More NDR 
  Questions


  
  All,
   
  GEFEG has 
  completed a pre-beta release of the next version of GEFEG.FX. This new release 
  includes support for UBL 2.0.  In completing development, we have the 
  following additional NDR questions:
   
  1. Schema: Core Component Parameters
  ------------------------------------
  This schema is no longer imported, only the 
  namespace is declared. But we still use the structure for documentation 
  described in this schema.
  We think it would be a good idea to list the 
  documentation items in a plain structure without ccts:component and 
  ccts:instance and to remove the CCP schema.
  2. 
  ccts:UsageRule
  ------------------------
  How to fill the value?
  3. 
  Documentation for ASBIE
  --------------------------
  In the NDR there is no documentation item that 
  reports the ObjectClassQualifier of an ASBIE. Apparently an error.
   
  4. 
  Identifier Type
  ------------------
  Due the use 
  of the UDT from ATG2 1.0 there is 
  an inconsistency between the rule for abbreviation and that UDT schema. 
  According to the rule the type has to be named "IDType", the schema says 
  "IdentifierType".
  5. 
  Redundancy Rules
  -------------------
  The is no rule for removing redundancies in 
  names for BBIEs. So you will find a lot of things like "IDIDType" and so 
  on. 
  How
   
  Can we add these 
  items to the agenda for today's call?
  Regards
  Sylvia












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]