SV: [ubl] Changes to UBL NDR

Title: Changes to UBL NDR

Hi 
Mike

 

I 
though that this reluctance was cleared away in the last Atlantic call. I 
understand your worry but in my suggestion the use of xsd:any is very restricted 
and is after all a bette suggestion than putting extensions into a CDATA 
construction in a note field, that we see a lot of today. A text field is after 
all just as undefined (if not more) that a xsd:any. 

 

We a 
problem with implementing the proposal in our own localization: How can we do a 
localization that does not follow the UBL NDR? Can we then call that UBL? Is it 
desireable for UBL that the largest implementation of UBL will not be 
UBL?

 

I 
agree with you that we should discuss this at the meeting today. 
We also need to discuss whether we want documents to be exchange 
within the UBL namespace or only within a derived namespace. If the UBL 
namspace is going to be used for the real world then UBL must listen to the 
requirement from the real world and not just let it be up to the 
implementors.

 Kind 
regards

Peter

 

  
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Grimley Michael J NPRI 
  [mailto:]
Sendt: 4. april 2006 
  22:30
Til: 
Cc: Peter 
  Borresen
Emne: RE: [ubl] Changes to UBL NDR

  
Peter,

  
 

  
I believe there is still significant reluctance to 
  allow xsd:any in the UBL Standard. Issues were raised in New York that I'm not 
  sure have been addressed. Have you considered my suggestion 
  of implementing it as a Danish extension to UBL, rather than it becoming 
  a part of the UBL standard?

  
 

  
Hopefully all 
  interested parties will be on the call tomorrow so we can reach closure on 
  this issue.

  
 

  
As far as 
  including additional information in a message, I believe that would be a 
  Content issue, rather than an NDR issue (aside from the fact that they would 
  need to be elements, rather than attributes).

  
 

  
Thank You,

  
Mike

  
 

  
    

    
    From: Peter Borresen [mailto:] 
    
Sent: Tuesday, 04 April 2006 0847
To: 
    
Subject: [ubl] Changes to UBL 
    NDR

    

    
Dear UBL TC 

    
Here is my proposal for updating the NDR so it 
    fits with the Danish requirements: 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
    
Chapter 5: 

    
Delete line 1583-1589   [This is allready 
    described in line 1790-1798] 
Change line 
    1790-1798 to: 

    
"UBL restricts use of xsd:any to extensions. 
    There can only be two usages of xsd:any in a document; one in the end of a 
    line element and one as the last element of the document. The content of a 
    xsd:any must point to a well known schema, approved by the UBL TC, UBL 
    subcommitee or a UBL localization group."

    
Chapter 8: 

    
Add a new section 8.5 (Section 8.5 becomes 8.6) 
    : 

    
8.5 Instance origin 

    
To be able to track how the instance was 
    generated the following process-instruction SHOULD be added to each document 
    instances:

    
<?InstanceInfo 
    
        Creator="<person or application (inklusiv full verison attributes) 
    that has generated the document" 
    
        Created="<date and time the document was send>" 
    
?> 

    
To be able to track what version of schemas an 
    instance was generated from the following attributes SHOULD be present in 
    each document:

    
      
MinorVersion 
      
Context 
      
Subset 
      
Profile 

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
    

    
Kind regards 

    
Peter 

    
PS: Maybe some one english speking person should 
    edit the text before chunking it into the NDR document.