Formal public comment: Testa (4)

We are in receipt of the following public comment, which should be
added to the issues list by the PSC.

   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/200603/msg00057.html

Jon

==================================================================

Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:22:25 +0000
From: 
Subject: [ubl-comment] Public Comment
To: 

Comment from: 

Name: Testa Veronique
Title : Project Manager
Organization: Cegedim

UBL 2.0 / Invoice 

Compare to UBL 1.0 AllowanceCharge/cbc:Amount is required. The problem is that an Allowance may have been negociated by Percent (not by Amount) and in this case, the Invoice may contains the Allowance in Percent...
Both may be transmitted but also either one or other..
Suggest to make AllowanceCharge/cbc:Amount optional

Thx
& Regards