[:]
There may be a problem with the progress of the UBP directly to
ballot as candidate committee specification in that it only
underwent the second UBL-1.0-SBS public review (15 days) and has
not had a review as a standalone draft.
Right. It will have to start over (TC balloting and then 60-day
review).
| If it does need to complete a 50 day review to be allowed to
| progress to committee specification ballot, how about we package
| it together with the UBP 2.0 which is at the stage of waiting for
| a vote to become a committee draft and public review
| draft. Perhaps the two would then be called UBP 1.0 and be
| packaged as one set of ebXML artifacts covering both UBL 1.0 and
| UBL 2.
OK with me. But note that if the UBP part is removed from 1.0
SBS, it will have to start over again, too.
Jon
