← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Formal public comment: pechoultres
Hello UBL, We are in receipt of the following public comment, which should be added to the issues list by the PSC. See followup messages at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/200603/msg00001.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/200603/msg00002.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/200603/msg00003.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/200603/msg00004.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/200603/msg00005.html Jon ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:08:17 +0000 From: Subject: [ubl-comment] Public Comment To: Comment from: Name:Xavier Pechoultres Title:Technical Director Organization:expert-solutions sarl Regarding Specification: UBL / UBL2 Draft We are working to use UBL as a part of our print supply chain system. We need to attach PDF documents to an Order (or to an ItemType). This documents contains legal informations, complex technical informations (manufacturing range) or technical specifications. The new AttachedDocumentType (UBL2 Draft) can be a solution but It cannot be added directly to an Order. Proposal : -- Adding a list of attached documents to [OrderType, QuotationType, OrderResponseType] -- Adding references to an attached document in the ItemType (or LineItemType) Best regards,
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →