Re: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 9|10 January 2006

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 9|10 January 2006




From: 
To: , 
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:07:19 EST










All,
 
I have experience with WIKI as a collaboration site. I think it is a great 
tool. It can provide for revision control of documents and is easy for people of 
varying skill to contribute to. In the end, the discussion pages can be simply 
saved off as web archives ".mht" and posted on the OASIS site as with other 
documents. This can be done weekly or monthly so revision history can be easily 
reviewed.
 
The WIKI we used last year in a project supported access controls. Visitors 
(i.e. non-members) could add comments but could not change the page content. It 
works very well. Learning curve is fairly shallow.
 
One way you could use it is to create one or more pages where the issue(s) 
are at the top and commentary is added below. Clarifications and updates to the 
issue can be done by whoever is authorized.
 
Marty
 
In a message dated 1/13/2006 11:01:08 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
 writes:
MINUTES 
  OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING
00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 10 JANUARY 
  2006

ATTENDANCE

   Jon Bosak (chair)
   
  Stephen Green
   Andy Schoka
   Sylvia 
  Webb

STANDING ITEMS

   Liaison report: ebBP TC; 
  subcommittee report: SBSC

      SG: Was waiting for 
  joint submission with ebBP TC... Have
      included some 
  things in SBS that are also in ebBP support
      document 
  folder.  These are now final as far as ebBP is
      
  concerned (will confirm this Tuesday).  Sascha Schlegel has
  
      successfully tested the SBS artifacts using Cyclone 
  Commerce
      software.  The SBS package has now been 
  submitted to the UBL
      TC and is ready for action by the 
  TC.

      ACTION: JB to put SBS on the agenda of the 
  Wednesday
      Atlantic TC call and start work on the CD2 
  ballot after that
      meeting.

   Review 
  of Atlantic call

      No comments.

   
  Schedule review

      JB: We will revise the schedule in 
  Manhattan.

ISSUES WIKI

   We briefly discussed the 
  idea of setting up a wiki for issue
   
  tracking.

   SW: If a wiki or something similar is used for 
  comments and
   issue resolution, GEFEG will still need a single 
  document at
   the end of the process containing any programming 
  requirements
   or issues along with their resolution.  
  DavidK does not have
   time to go through a collaborative 
  environment.

   Various: We have reservations about how this 
  would work... how
   searches would work... how to produce a list 
  of comments and
   dispositions that would meet the requirements 
  of the OASIS
   process... how to control 
  access...

   ACTION: JB to add a discussion of issues 
  tracking to the agenda
   for Manhattan.

ACTION ITEM TO BE 
  ASSIGNED

   [Saito-san:]

      | (3) 
  There are descriptions about changed Elements and
      | 
  Attributes at section 1.3.3 and 1.3.4. There is no information
  
      | of the reason why these Elements and Attributes are
  
      | changed. Especially, removed items should need to describe 
  the
      | reasons. For example: The item is removed 
  because the function
      | became unnecessary. The item is 
  removed because the item is
      | achieved by another 
  means.

   SW: For the majority of PSC meetings, MarkL and 
  PeterB did most
   of the changing, and Peter did most or all of 
  the
   documentation.  This is well minuted.  So this 
  work should be
   done primarily by Peter and 
  Mark.

   JB: Will suggest that they do this offline.  
  [But it now occurs
   to me that this could be done at the 
  meeting in Manhattan.]

ACTION ITEM REVIEW

   ACTION: 
  JB to contact PB regarding example instances for
   
  Manhattan.

   SG: Have been working on certain documents; 
  plan is to finish
   in Manhattan.

OTHER 
  BUSINESS

   AS: We need to develop techniques for seeing the 
  forest rather
   than the trees...

   SG: Like 
  Dave Carlson's class diagrams in 1.0.

   JB: TC calls will 
  (as usual) be canceled next week and the week
   following the 
  F2F in Manhattan.  We will have a Pacific call
   next week, 
  but it will be an informal work session.

   JB: It's looking 
  like the meeting in Brussels originally
   scheduled for the week 
  of 24 April will have to move out a
   couple of weeks to give us 
  time to prep the issues for
   disposition.

   
  SG: May would be good.

Jon Bosak
Chair, OASIS UBL 
  TC

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
  unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates 
  this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
  OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



 












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]