Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

From
Mark Leitch <>
Date
2005-10-26T16:12:36+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode
Title: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

The inconsistency crosses the 1.0 document lines and the extended document lines.

M

Mark Leitch

Director - Tritorr Ltd

Tel.:   +44 1932 821112

Cell.:  +44 7881 822999

Mail:   

Site:   www.tritorr.com

> From: Stephen Green <>

> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:38:10 +0100

> To: <>

> Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

> 

> Mark

> 

> If you were to put this to a vote in PSC I'd vote against changing it - with 

> the reasons:

> 1. it would take too long (not enough time available) to go back over this now

> 2. this is a core part of the UBL procurement documents

> 3. just saying it looks inconsistent isn't, to my view, enough

>  - generally inconsistencies appear to be so at first glance but looking into 

> it further with the original reasoning often reveals good reasons why 

> something is so - that's my experience in UBL anyway (after all there have 

> been things to consider such as alignment with EDI standards which do have 

> some peculiarities - but sometimes for good reason and usually with an 

> investment of implemenation to consider).

> 4 - the rule is to avoid semantic changes where possible and that would 

> especially apply to deletions

> 

> All the best

> 

> Steve

> 

> 

>>>> Mark Leitch <> 26/10/05 16:21:21 >>>

> I just want to see consistency in approach.  Either all lines should have a

> Line Status Code or none should.

> 

> M

> 

> Mark Leitch

> Director - Tritorr Ltd

> Tel.:   +44 1932 821112

> Cell.:  +44 7881 822999

> Mail:    

> Site:   www.tritorr.com 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>> From: Stephen Green <>

>> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:06:03 +0100

>> To: <>, <>

>> Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

>> 

>> What if I can remember there was lots of discussion to add Line Status Code

>> but can't remember all of it and don't have time to go back to all the 

>> emails,

>> etc concerning it?

>> 

>> What if we did this to every BIE we didn't personally understand?

>> 

>>>>> Mikkel Hippe Brun <> 26/10/05 14:58:29 >>>

>> 

>> ...

>> 

>> In my opinion LineStatusCode should be removed if someone cannot come up

>> with a good explanation and business case for its use.

>> 

>> - Regards Mikkel

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

>> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

>> at:

>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

>> 

>> 

>> 

> 

> 

> 

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

> at:

> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

> 

> 

>