Re: [ubl] Code list schema

From
CRAWFORD, Mark <>
Date
2005-08-17T12:31:51+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl] Code list schema
Title: Re: [ubl] Code list schema

Tony,

One of our guiding principles was that e would make no assumptions abot tools. How doess first pass/second pass qlign with that?

Mark R. Crawford

Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead

W3C Advisory Committee and OASIS Representative,

Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC

Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Applied Technologies Group

Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group

Co-Chair ISO TC154 Subcommittee for ISO 15000-5

--

LMI Government Consulting

2000 Corporate Ridge

McLean, VA 22102-7805

703.917.7177 Phone

703.655.4810 Wireless

The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater

www.lmi.org

-----Original Message-----

From: Anthony B. Coates <>

To:  <>

Sent: Wed Aug 17 07:07:42 2005

Subject: Re: [ubl] Code list schema

Dear Mark,

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:28:47 +0100, CRAWFORD, Mark <> 

wrote:

> It strikes me that this path we are on for code lists is creating

> dependencies that we should be avoiding.  I think we should step back

> and revisit our requirements as it appears to me we are creating a

> solution in search of a problem.  The original issue was how do we avoid

> enumerations in our schema.  More specifically, how do we avoid

> enumerations of code and identifier lists that someone else has

> ownership of.  Our original solution was simple (and simplistic in

> keeping with our original guiding principles)  - avoid enumerations,

> generate a code list schema for those code lists we created, try and get

> code list owners to generate a similar schema, and if necessary generate

> code list schema for external code lists if the code list owner wouldn't

> do it.  We are now bogged down into first/second pass validations,

> schematron vs XSD, wildcards, substitution groups, and a plethora of

> other rat holes that are taking us very far a field from the original

> issue.  From my perspective, if we can't provide a simple code list

> schema template for others to use, then we probably should just avoid

> the whole code list issue and leave it up to implementers how they wish

> to deal with it.

Well, this is just the first/second pass validation approach, without UBL 

providing any help for the second pass.  All we have been talking about is 

providing some help for that second pass.  It's not such a big change from 

what you describe.

As for representing code list contents in XML, I'm sure it wasn't among 

the things you discussed originally, because it's an idea I brought to UBL 

late in the 1.0 cycle.  Is that such an issue?

> I am also concerned that we will create a very complex solution for UBL

> 2.0 only to see it abandoned for UBL 3.0 by CEFACT.

We'll see.  I am joining CCTS at Gunther's request so we can get code 

lists on the CEFACT agenda.

Cheers, Tony.

--

Anthony B. Coates

London Market Systems Limited

33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR, UK

http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/

mailto:

Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026

[MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/]

[FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language), 

http://www.fpml.org/]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material 

and is intended for the use of the addressee only.  Any unauthorised use 

may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake please advise the 

sender immediately by using the reply  facility in your e-mail software.  

Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems 

Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of 

this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus 

infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no 

responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please 

request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions 

presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of 

London Market Systems Limited.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php