Re: [ubl] Candidate approach for W3C Schema with wild cards for code list value validation

[:]

| I do not *like* replacing placebo files with other definitions and
| would rather work with the XSD files untouched, but it would seem
| W3C Schema technology does not allow that import flexibility.
| 
| I will now focus my time on Schematron since W3C Schema is holding
| me back.

If we can make two-pass validation that includes a Schematron
check as easy for the user as a one-pass XSD validation, then I
don't see any value in providing all the code lists as XSD schemas
anyway.

Jon