Re: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups

From
Stephen Green <>
Date
2005-07-18T10:19:15+00:00
ID
007d01c58b82$1c729d90$a504190a@britsdg
Thread
Re: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups
Title: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups

Folks,

 

As we are looking at substitution groups 
in

advance of the codelist discussion 
(though

leading into it of course) I thought I'll 
need

to jump the gun a bit 
on prototyping I 
adapted 

from some work I've been doing 
with Marty

(based on his prototypes for codelist 
extension).

 

It uses the latest UBL 2.0 draft 
schemas

sent by David over the last few days. 

It demonstrates both 

 

1. Marty's codelist mechanism which now 

uses substitution groups * without abstracts * 

(personally I'm all 
for that following the work 

we did with Arofan, 
though I still dislike the

abstract element/type method)

 

2. Arofan's general minor versioning

(and customisation) mechanism which we 

worked on in the working team in 
April.

 

Notably, using the latest schemas is

rather more satisfying and assuring in

that it shows there to be no 
development

problem at all in using the 
substitution

group / global elements / global types

(without abstracts) / derivation 
mechanism

with our current 2.0 schemas to 
produce

a * hypothetical * 2.1 set of extended 
minor

version schemas (both BIEs and 
codelists

extended).

 

The attached file can be saved with 
extension

.zip then unzipped.

 

All the best

 

Steve

 

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  CRAWFORD, Mark 
  

  
To:  

  
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:41 AM

  
Subject: RE: [ubl] Discussion of 
  substitution groups

  

  

  
>Remember that we are discussing substitution 
  groups (and possible
>alternatives to the same) as a code list extension 
  mechanism in
>next week's Atlantic TC call.  Given that Mark 
  Crawford will be
>unable to attend, it would be good to have as much 
  information as
>possible (including the outcome of discussions with 
  Henry
>Thompson) posted to this list prior to that meeting, preferably 
  at
>the beginning of the week.

Remember that our discussions on 
  the use of substitution groups within our UBL NDR needs to focus on what our 
  requirements are for developing UBL normative schema from our models for 
  vote by the TC - to include UBL developed code lists.  Customizer 
  requirements are left to the extension methodology.

  
 

  
Mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates 
  this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: 
  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

SDG_SubstitutionGroups_20050718.zzz