Hi Folks,
The examples of customization I posted
at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200506/bin00010.bin
were not using actual UBL 1.0 schemas.
I wonder if it would help to produce
a set of examples based on UBL 1.0.
Would this be valuable?
All the best
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Rasmussen" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 1:39 PM
Subject: SV: [ubl] rewriting schemas
> hmm, I guess this was the rule I was thinking of: [NMS3] UBL namespaces
MUST
> only contain UBL developed schema modules.
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Bryan Rasmussen
> Sendt: 7. juli 2005 14:20
> Til: ''
> Emne: [ubl] rewriting schemas
>
>
>
> I can't find this in the UBL-NDR-1.0.1, although I seem to remember that
it
> was there at one point, is there a rule specifically against taking the
UBL
> schemas and rewriting one of the elements in there to have a different
> cardinality, although still within the cardinality of the original schemas
> (as one example of a change that would not have any meaningful effect on
> validation)?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
