Greetings Mark,
Unfortunately in this situation where we need another
namespace, the NDR prevents use of an internal schema
module:
"[SSM6] All UBL internal schema modules MUST be in the same namespace as
their
corresponding document schema."
Best Regards
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: RE: [ubl] ACC? AW: [ubl] PLENARY REPORT FROM THE UBL TC MEETING IN
HANGZHOU 9 MAY - 13 MAY 2005
> Just noting that the original issue seems not to be whether a
> document has BBIEs just below the top level but whether these
> BBIEs belong to the document namespace or to the common or
> core namespaces (common basic components).
> In other words if they belonged to the
> document namespace then they would be
> "not in the Common Basic Components".
> This is the UBL 1.0 problem I think is to be addressed.
It seems to me this is exactly why we created the internal schema
modules - ABIEs and BBIEs that were unique could be declared in the
document namespace since the internal schema module resides in that
space.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
