Re: [ubl] [ver] a prototype that works

Title: Re: [ubl] [ver] a prototype that works

But does this mean everything is given a version update - even if it doesn't change? That is terribly monolithic. I would prefer we import static types and define new or changed types.

Mark R. Crawford

Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead

W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative

Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee

Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group

Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components

--

LMI Government Consulting

2000 Corporate Ridge

McLean, VA 22102-7805

703.917.7177 Phone

703.655.4810 Wireless

The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater

www.lmi.org

-----Original Message-----

From:  <>

To:  <>;  <>

Sent: Tue Apr 19 12:39:36 2005

Subject: Re: [ubl] [ver] a prototype that works

[:]

| David,

|

| Could you please define what you mean by redeclare? 

He means just issuing a completely redone set of schemas (rather

than importing anything from 1.0).

Jon

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php