Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6

From
Stephen Green
Date
2004-07-15T20:09:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6

From: "Stephen Green" <>

To: <>

Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:13:43 +0100

Mike

At present it is possible to have (and we do have it) in one place
AddressLine
following Address (quite rightly) and, in the same Schema, elsewhere to have
AddressLineType preceding AddressType.
This is because '..Type' is included when deciding the order alphabetically
- T comes after L.
We need a rule to say that Schema-associated terms such as the 'Type'
suffix should be ignored when calculating the order (wherever the order
is not dictated by the model, e.g. when producing an xsd:sequence).
(And case isn't really a factor.)

That's my recollection of the result of the Pacific call on 1st July.

All the best

Steve