Re: AW: [ubl] FW: [ubl-comment] Review and comments of OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) V1.0

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: AW: [ubl] FW: [ubl-comment] Review and comments of OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) V1.0




From: Tim McGrath <>
To: "Stuhec, Gunther" <>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:36:30 +0800










Gunther ,


can you clarify that you were comparing UBL 1.0 against NDR draft wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp?


If so, then you should be aware that the document wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp is work in progress and that
UBL 1.0 complies only with the rules in  the attached NDR checklist.


The document wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp
is  currently being edited to incorporate many changes which will affect
your comments.


As such these are more input into the NDR document editing than into the
UBL 1.0 specification.



Stuhec, Gunther wrote:

  
  
  
   
  
 
  Hello all,
 
   
 
  I made a mistake
in my  starting text. The right text is:
 We have reviewed the OASIS Universal Business
 Language (UBL) V1.0 in detail and we're strongly not in favor with the statement: "These
 document assembly models are then transformed in accordance with UBL Naming
and  Design Rules into W3C XSD schema syntax.". 
 
   
 
  Kind regards,
 
   
 
       Gunther

  
 
        
    -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:     [mailto:]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juni 2004    13:56
An: ;    
Betreff: [ubl] FW: [ubl-comment] Review    and comments of OASIS
Universal Business Language (UBL) V1.0


   
       
    Folks,
   
     
   
    Gunther sent this in last week.  Given the nature of the
   comments, we need to ensure we address these as part of our review   
process.  I would like these added to the issues list.
   
     
   
    Mark

   
       
       
   
    From: Stuhec, Gunther
   [mailto:]
Sent: Fri 6/18/2004 3:05    AM
To: ''
Cc: Von Riegen,    Claus
Subject: [ubl-comment] Review and comments of OASIS Universal
   Business Language (UBL) V1.0


    
   
       
    Hello all, 
   
    regrets for sending our comments after
the    deadline. I was in vacation, therefore I couldn't sent our comments
earlier. I    hope you'll still recognize our comments.
   
    We have reviewed the OASIS Universal Business
   Language (UBL) V1.0 in detail and we're strongly in favor with the statement:
   "These document assembly models are then transformed in accordance with
UBL    Naming and Design Rules into W3C XSD schema syntax.". We compared
the schemas    of the UBL libraries with the rules of wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp
and have    seen a high number of discrepancies. The following list shows
only the most    serious discrepancies:
   
    - The overall schema structures are not
based on    the rules of chapter 3.1.
- The namespaces    are not based on the
namespace rules of chapter 3.4.2 (Namespace Uniform    Resource Identifiers).
- Each attribute    names do not based on
the conventions of chapter 4.4 (Attribute Naming    Rules).
- The structure of the annotations    are
not similar to the definitions in chapter 3.7
- The codelist representation are completely
different as described in    chapter 6 (Code Lists). Especially the code
list namespaces do not based on    the rules [CDLX] and [CDLXX].
   
    Furthermore, we have seen that there is
no    consistency in the tag names of BBIEs and ASBIEs. Some of tag names
using the    "Object Class Term" and others not. Some of the tag names are
prefixed by    namespace prefix and others not. This kind of inconsistency
does not allow us    an efficient and reusable implementation of the components
(ABIE, BBIE and    ASBIE), because these requires for every qualified form
of component an    individual development of the interface. Therefore, we're
still highly    recommending the usage of "Venetian Blind" approach instead
of "Garden of    Eden" apprach, because the "Venetian Blind" approach can
solve all mentioned    inconsistencies.
   
    Kind regards, 
   
            Gunther    Stuhec 
    
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed    from the roster
of the OASIS TC), go to    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
 


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160