MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)
From: "Sylvia Webb" <>
To: <>,"'Stephen Green'" <>,<>,<>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:24:38 -0700
Anne and Stephen,
Both of your messages are excellent examples that emphasize the need for a
structured QA process for the spreadsheets, models, and schema. IMHO, we
need to develop a structured, systematic, repeatable process for review and
QA that reduces differences in the future, and, reduces the amount of time
spent for review and re-review. Other industry groups and standards bodies
that I participate in have found a similar need mandatory, not just an
option. I would like to suggest that the SSC TC form a QA workgroup that
will be responsible for QA of all UBL releases. If such a group is formed, I
will gladly volunteer to participate.
Regards,
Sylvia
