MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Meeting Minutes UBL Joint meeting Mar 23rd 2004
From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <>
To:
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:56:21 -0500
> 9) We only need cbcs for each "BBIE property" (PropertyTerm+Rep.Term) -
> not a cbc for each qualified BBIEs. although i am then not sure how
> we can name any qualified BBIEs.
> AI - Mike G -research and give example(s) for discussion Wed.
It was requested that I use the following items from the CBC schema as an example:
<xsd:element name="StreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>
<xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="udt:NameType"/>
Reference:
wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc [Line 1848]: BBIE properties are represented with complex types.
Rule [CTD5][Line 1858] Every ccts:BBIEProperty xsd:complexType content model xsd:base attribute
value MUST be the ccts:CCT of the unspecialised or specialised UBL
datatype as appropriate.
Example:
What would be expected in the CBC schema would be a type 'StreetNameType' with base="udt:NameType".
Then we would have:
<xsd:element name="StreetName" type="StreetNameType"/>
In the CAC Schema (or wherever), where you need 'AdditionalStreetName', it would be declared as:
<xsd:element name="AdditionalStreetName" type="cbc:StreetNameType"/>
