Re: [ubl] Groups - draft-9.1.zip uploaded

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl] Groups - draft-9.1.zip uploaded

From: Tim McGrath <>

To: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <>

Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:05:07 +0800

i am not sure if you are saying we don't need a Core Component
Parameters schema or that we are not putting documentation with every
type definition.

we have always had a Core Component Parameters schema.  it is used to
define the documentation elements.  what we have done for draft 9.1 is
update this schema to have the same/correct names for things (they had
gone out of synch.).

but the larger question is, if we don't use a parameters schema then
how do we ensure we use consistent documentation components across all
modules?

CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:

  
The documentation is to be with every type definition where occuring. The modularity model never called for or supported the parameters module - nor should it.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481 
Wireless (703) 655-4810

http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"