Re: [ubl] UBL 1.0 draft 5 models and change log (and list of a fewSchema changes)

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] UBL 1.0 draft 5 models and change log (and list of a fewSchema changes)




From: Tim McGrath <>
To: Stephen Green <>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:14:53 +0800










i am sorry i have not updated the code list catalog anbd accept it was my
action item.  


my original plan was to bring it into line with the CCT 'code type' model.
 that is ensue our models have the data to populate the CCT data type.


i was expecting some feedback on the draft code type model i sent out and
i also need to complete reading the code list paper just to make sure they
all line up.


i hope to do that this week and will distribute it then.


Stephen Green wrote:

  
  
 
  
 
    
  For those who might need these this week
I've  attached
 
  the models for draft 5 (including change
 log).
 
   
 
  Please note that I've included a Codelist
 Catalogue
 
  spreadsheet which is *not* the most up-to-date
(Tim  has
 
  apparently sent out a tidied-up version
but I don't  appear to have it).
 
   
 
  The only major Schema changes, as far
as I can  recollect
 
  (my Schemas were mainly illustrative and
so I  haven't
 
  been keeping a very detailed log of my
Schema  changes),
 
  since beta were:
 
   
 
  1. Representation Terms Schema - restrictions,
etc  removed
 
  2. Reusable Schema - split into two, one
with just  reused
 
      BBIEs (which I've called  ReusableBasic
but just for
 
      illustration for now) and the  other
with everything else.
 
  3. The namespaces for the reusable Schemas
 changed
 
      to include  '..CommonAggregateComponents..' 
 
      and '..CommonBasicComponents..'  (new),
with prefixes
 
      cac: and cbc:  respectively
 
   
 
  (I found I could cope with these changes
using  UBLish
 
  quite easily with simple editing of the
scripts and  then
 
  post-generation editing in a text editor,
so they  are not
 
  too drastic.)
 
   
 
  I can't remember any other changes apart
from  changes 
 
  due to the changes in the models (see
attached  change log)
 
   
 
  Apologies again for a large attachment
but I  thought it
 
  might be quite a milestone one for the
model since  we
 
  haven't changed it further this final
pre-plenary  week.
 
   
 
  Good luck in Washington those who are
there. I  hope
 
  to join the calls almost every day.
 
   
 
  Steve
  
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.