Re: [ubl] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposal 3 in our CCTS feedback

MHonArc v2.5.2 -->



















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposal 3 in our CCTS feedback




From: "Eve L. Maler" <>
To: 
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:41:26 -0400






Even though I'm a newbie when it comes to 11179/ebXML stuff, I like it 
too.  I think the original definition of RT nicely encapsulates the 
semantic and structural aspects of RT/CCT taken together.  (There's only 
one part that I still find counter-intuitive: A "Representation Term" 
should be merely the name assigned to a "Representation", but we never 
see "Representation" treated as a real thing on its own.)

	Eve

Michael C. Rawlins wrote:
> Ooh!  Mikey likes it!
> 
> Thanks, Tim, for doing the research on this.
> 
> Tim McGrath wrote:
...
>> In fact, looking at this again, I wonder if  just asking them to adopt 
>> the original ISO 11179 definition is what we really mean!??

-- 
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com