Removing it allows one to do or not do this. I believe the general request
is to provide these two forms of the schema and there should be a
rule/requirement that states this.
..dan
At 10:51 PM 7/15/2003 +0800, Chin Chee-Kai wrote:
>Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are
> otherwise the same except for documentation
> is a user-level optimisation/preference issue
> that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR.
>
>This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative
>add-on, or reading aid or optimized version (assuming
>documented version is normative).
>
>Suggest removing it.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>Chin Chee-Kai
>SoftML
>Tel: +65-6820-2979
>Fax: +65-6743-7875
>Email:
>http://SoftML.Net/
>
>
>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>
> >>Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
> >>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it. The
> >>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
> >>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
> >>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
> >>
> >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
> >>
> >>Voting period on this rule ends: July 22, 2003
> >>
> >>*******************************
> >>[R 96] Two schemas shall be developed for each standard. One schema shall
> >>be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall be a fully
> >>annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations.
> >>
> >>
> >>ATG Decision: ACCEPTED.
> >>
> >>
> >>---
> >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
> >>
>
