RE: [ubl-lcsc] One more rev? (was: qualified element names in top-level message defs)
ubl-lcsc · January 2003 · 1 message · back to month
| # | Subject | From | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00122 | RE: [ubl-lcsc] One more rev? (was: qualified element names in top-level message defs) | Stuhec, Gunther | 2003-01-23 00:45 |