Hi Chet, Please don't be hard on yourself. We've all been foiled by various template documents (that shall remain nameless) in our past! :-) That said; I must reluctantly ask you to send that note correcting the reference at your earliest convenience, just so that folks don't think that TOSCA has any relationship or dependency upon XACML.
Thanks again for your helpfulness, Paul
From: Chet Ensign [ mailto: ] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:05 PM
To: Lipton, Paul C
Cc:
Subject: Re: [tosca] Your 30 day public review for Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications V1.0 has been announced Argh! I left that in my message template. Grumble. Well, up to you. I'll be happy to send a note correcting just the reference to the IPR link if you think anyone might have questions about that. Your call. Going back to fix my template right now... On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Lipton, Paul C <> wrote: Hi Chet, Thanks for your help and prompt attention to this matter. I am already subscribed to monitor comments and will be "point-man." One question, if I may. I note that reference [3] in the announcement references XACML as the IPR. Do you think that should be corrected? It currently references: [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml/ipr.php
Thanks, Paul
