Hi Scott,
I don't think most TCs do this, but that's fine - although it
needs to reference the specific version of the spec it's associated
with (not the filename, but the reference).
On the other hand, no schema was previously identified; nor was it
included in the public review notice; nor does it live at the location
you've identified. Would the addition of a normative schema not be a
substantive change?
Mary
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
> Thanks, one last question...historically we have never named schema
> artifacts with the publication status or draft number because people
> get
> annoyed by schemas changing names (due to location hints for editors
> and so
> forth).
>
> That makes it impossible to point directly to a versioned artifact
> in the
> normative reference, but if that's the policy, then I'll upload a
> renamed
> copy.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
