← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

work product review

From
Mary McRae <>
Date
2009-10-28T00:40:56+00:00
ID
Thread
work product review
The following issues have been idientified in the submitted work product and must be corrected before it can be uploaded to docs.oasis-open.org and a ballot started to approve as a Committee Specification (please note the current CD01 as submitted for public review and uploaded to http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/Post2.0/sstc-saml-delegation-cd-01.odt):

1. Please add Version designation to this document

2. Stage is to be on a line by itself

3. Date is to be on a line by itself

4. The name of the TC needs to be hypertext-linked to the TC's public home page

5. Citations to OASIS work are not in the proper format as noted in the template documents

NOTE: The proper format for a citation to an OASIS Technical Committee's work (whether Normative or Non-Normative) is:

OASIS 

Stage (Committee Draft 01, Committee Draft 02, Committee Specifcation 01, etc. or Standard)

Title (italicized or in quotation marks)

Approval Date (Month YYYY)

URI of the actual Authoritative Specification (namespace is not acceptable as the content changes over time)

For example:

 [EDXL-HAVE] 

OASIS Standard, "Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 1.0", November 2008.

  http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/os/emergency_edxl_have-1.0-spec-os.doc

6. Conformance must be the last-numbered section immediately preceding Appendices

Regards,

Mary

 

Mary P McRae

Director, Standards Development

Technical Committee Administrator

OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society

email:  

web: www.oasis-open.org

twitter: fiberartisan  #oasisopen

phone: 1.603.232.9090

Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread