Paul Madsen wrote on 2009-05-01:
> 1) can you point me to the corresponding URIs?
I don't think they're 100% baked yet.
> The AC class mechanism would have us (or InCommon) jump through the hoop
of
> defining a set of class schemas that then linked to the profiles through
the
> <Documentation> kluge ..
Yes, that was one of the reasons I wasn't sure using them was the "right
thing". Perhaps using a declaration is more appropriate. The theory of this
approach to LOA is that none of the other details matter and have all been
abstracted into that number.
> 2) Is linking to the profiles, directly or indirectly, the right thing?
> Should we not link to appropriate sections of the InCommon framework
> docs, i.e. to ensure that the profiles are interpreted in the context of
> the full IAAF?
I don't think this document should link to anything. I think that was the
point being made, that it can't do so other than as purely example material.
> 3) I cant find any info on how the IAQs are expressed on the wire. As
> attributes?
TBD, but we have to support SAML 1.1, so using an Attribute is a logical
choice. Additionally, we defined the metadata tagging extension partly to
enable things like tagging entities with the LOAs that they can assert, and
that would be an Attribute anyway.
-- Scott
