← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Potential Erratum -- NameIDMappingResponse schema

From
Ari Kermaier <>
Date
2007-04-26T15:46:43+00:00
ID
20070426114409396.00000004632@ari-laptop
Thread
Potential Erratum -- NameIDMappingResponse schema
Alas, I've noticed 
what appears to be a problem with the SAML 2.0 Core spec for the NameIDMapping 
protocol. Section 3.8.2 [lines 2721-2724] define the NameIDMappingResponseType 
as extending StatusResponseType with the addition of a choice of saml:NameID or 
saml:EncryptedID element. The schema does not indicate minoccurs="0", making 
exactly one of these elements required in any 
samlp:NameIDMappingResponse.

 

What is the response 
supposed to look like if an error Status is being returned? I would assume that 
the NameID/EncryptedID would have to be omitted, but the schema doesn't 
allow it.

 

::Ari

Ari Kermaier | 
Senior Development Manager | +1.212.520.7304
Oracle Server 
Technologies | Identity Management & Security
444 Madison Avenue, Suite 
300 | New York, NY 10022
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread