Re: [security-services] sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01 erratum?

From
Eve L. Maler <>
Date
2007-04-13T15:22:09+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [security-services] sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01 erratum?
Whoops!  Okay, now what to do?  The AE doc is in post-CD pre-public 
review purgatory at the moment.  Should we withdraw, fix, and do a 
quick cd-02?

	Eve

Scott Cantor wrote:
>> But it seems pretty clear, from Section 8.3.1 of [SAMLCore] and from E60
>> of the Approved Errata, that the correct URI should be:
>>
>> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified
> 
> Yes, it is. If the format in 2.0 had the same meaning as the old, we left the URI alone.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Eve Maler                                         +1 425 947 4522
Technology Director                           eve.maler @ sun.com
CTO Business Alliances group                Sun Microsystems, Inc.